Skip to main content

Lead in Washington school drinking water

What Washington publishes about lead testing in its schools’ drinking water, what those numbers cover, and how we checked it. One row of a 51-jurisdiction survey, verified jurisdiction by jurisdiction rather than compiled from a single list.

WashingtonPublishes results, breadth not yet rated

Publishing status
Publishes results
Coverage
Not yet rated by this survey — the jurisdiction publishes results and it is our breadth rating that is outstanding, not the size of its dataset
Data vintage
currency not established by the evidence we hold
Evidence
confirmed at sourceConfirmed at source 2026-08-09

Action level

Published action level, as verified in 2026: 5 ppb

The results below are counted against that level, which the source records as set in statute.

Action levels are not comparable between jurisdictions: across the 51 we surveyed they run from 1 ppb to 20 ppb, so a share of results above “the action level” measures the threshold as much as it measures the water. We never rank states on it. Where a jurisdiction explains how its own level was set, the verified research note at the foot of this page records the explanation verbatim.

Washington: published results

The source publishes one row per sample taken at a fixture, so every figure below counts fixture samples. A sample is counted above the action level here when its measured value is at or above 5 ppb.

Samples collected
20,366
Non-detects
7,673 — reported below the laboratory’s reporting limit. A non-detect is a censored observation, not a zero and not the limit, so it counts in the samples-collected denominator and is excluded from the measured one.
Measured results
12,693

7,673 non-detects + 12,693 measured = 20,366 samples collected

22.2% (4,531 of 20,366 samples collected) — fixtures at or above 5 ppb, the state's action level

35.7% (4,531 of 12,693 measured samples) — fixtures at or above 5 ppb, the state's action level

Both figures count the same 4,531 results at or above 5 ppb. They differ only in what that count is divided by, and dropping the rows with no measured value can only raise the rate — for a state reporting mostly non-detects it raises it by more than an order of magnitude. So we publish both denominators, and neither figure is ever shown alone.

85.4% (351 of 411 schools with published results) — schools at or above 5 ppb, the state's action level

The two rates above count fixture samples; this one counts schools with at least one sample at or above the level. The gap between them is itself informative, and the two units must never be mixed inside one comparison.

Sampling period: 2001-03-13 to 2019-04-09.

Testing is required by Washington's own school testing requirement, which this survey records as in force; the survey has not established which programme produced the rows published here.

Download the raw Washington results

Every row behind the figures above, exactly as the source published it — the verbatim result string alongside the normalised value, the non-detect flag, the state’s own action level on every row, and the sample date with no window applied.

Washington results (CSV) · 20,366 rows · CC BY 4.0

This page names no schools. Named readings live on the lookup, where the state’s remediation note is rendered beside every one of them.

What changed since 2021

The baseline is the National Association of State Boards of Education’s 2021 survey. Every 2026 value below was re-checked for this survey; a value that did not move is a finding too.

Testing required
2021 baseline: Yes · verified 2026: Yes
Action level
2021 baseline: 5 · verified 2026: 5
Publishes results
2021 baseline: Yes · verified 2026: Yes

Nothing in this row moved between the 2021 baseline and our 2026 verification.

Source and verification

What we checked
https://data.wa.gov/resource/i3jn-y8vx.json
Checked on
— confirmed at source
Machine readability
T1 — machine-readable API or dataset
Results retrieved from
https://data.wa.gov/resource/i3jn-y8vx.json
Results retrieved on

Verified research note

Our field note for Washington, published verbatim rather than summarised. Where it quotes a figure from a source, that is the source’s own number reproduced as we recorded it, not a rate we computed — everything we compute states its denominator and its unit.

20,366 sample-level rows with lead_ppb per individual sample. Richest raw data found in any state.

Cite this page

TapWaterData Editorial. "School drinking water lead testing: Washington." TapWaterData national school drinking-water lead testing database. Last updated 2026-08-09. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. https://www.tapwaterdata.com/school-lead-testing/washington

@misc{tapwaterdata_school_lead_2026,
  author       = {TapWaterData Editorial},
  title        = {School drinking water lead testing: Washington},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://www.tapwaterdata.com/school-lead-testing/washington}},
  note         = {Last updated 2026-08-09. Licensed under CC BY 4.0}
}

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) licence — free to republish, chart or build on with attribution. Last updated .

All 51 jurisdictions — the national scorecard, the tier map, and the methodology behind every rating on this page.

Stay Informed About Your Water Quality

Get EPA reports, filter recommendations, and safety alerts for your area.

Join 10,000+ people protecting their families. Unsubscribe anytime.