Skip to main content
๐Ÿ’ง TapWaterData

Well water data & methodology

Roughly 43 million Americans rely on private wells, which are not covered by the Safe Drinking Water Act โ€” testing is the owner's responsibility. To help owners gauge local risk before they test, we pair federal USGS groundwater models with EPA and USDA datasets to estimate county-area risk, and we are explicit about the limits.

These are area estimates โ€” not a test of your well

These figures are USGS area estimates: statistical groundwater models describing how likely elevated contaminant levels are across a county. They are not designed to predict the concentration in any single well. Only testing your own well reveals its water quality.

What we model

  • Arsenic โ€” probability of exceedance

    A USGS national model estimates the probability that a private well in the county area exceeds 1, 5, and 10 ยตg/L (the EPA limit is 10 ยตg/L). The thresholds are fit as three independent models, so we only show the โ‰ฅ5 ยตg/L figure beneath the โ‰ฅ10 ยตg/L headline when the pair is coherent.

  • Nitrate โ€” predicted concentration

    A USGS model predicts the nitrate (as N) concentration at domestic-supply depth for the county area. The EPA limit is 10 mg/L.

  • Private-well population

    Modeled count of people and households on private (domestic) wells, from the USGS domestic-well population release combined with Census geography.

  • Uranium & radon (New Hampshire only)

    New Hampshire publishes a state-specific groundwater model for uranium and radon; we surface it only for NH counties and label every other state as 'no state model available' rather than guess.

  • Primary aquifer

    The dominant USGS principal aquifer mapped under the county โ€” area context for where wells draw from, not a determination for any single well.

  • Agricultural land use (crop pressure)

    The row-crop fraction of the county area (USDA Cropland Data Layer). Intensive row-crop land raises nitrate risk, so it is a predictor we surface โ€” never a measurement of nitrate in a well.

  • PFAS โ€” public-system proxy

    PFAS detections in nearby PUBLIC water systems under EPA's UCMR5 program. This is a regional proxy, explicitly NOT a measurement of any private well.

  • Observed samples & confidence

    Reported monitoring samples from the EPA/USGS Water Quality Portal give a local-density signal that drives the per-page data-confidence chip (sparse vs. well-corroborated).

How we build & validate it

  • County boundaries are reprojected into each raster's native coordinate system before zonal averaging, so every figure is read from the model exactly where the county sits.
  • We never fabricate a number. A county missing a required national metric (arsenic, nitrate, or population) is not published at all; an optional layer with no real value is shown as "not available", never as zero.
  • Every served county passes a schema + honesty validator before it can reach a page, so a malformed or partial record becomes a 404 rather than a misleading "0%".
  • Community-contributed lab results are only ever shown as area-level aggregates once at least ten wells have reported โ€” never as an individual result.

Data sources

Every figure traces to a public federal dataset. The exact sources that contributed to a given county are listed on that county's page.

By TapWaterData Editorial.

Stay Informed About Your Water Quality

Get EPA reports, filter recommendations, and safety alerts for your area.

Join 10,000+ people protecting their families. Unsubscribe anytime.